The photograph analyzed here (ESP_038184_1815) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 18 September 2014 and is described as ‘Fractured Mesa in Elysium Planitia.’
In Part 1 of 2 I present more megalithic blocks, ruins, walls, structures and what may be outposts or hangars.
The artefacts shown here are some of the best I’ve discovered, the photograph is also clean and crisp.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_038184_1815) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 18 September 2014 and is described as ‘Fractured Mesa in Elysium Planitia.’
More megalithic blocks, ruins, walls, structures and what may be outposts or hangars.
The artefacts shown here are some of the best I’ve discovered, the photograph is also clean and crisp.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_038846_1345) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 09 November 2014 and is described as ‘Terrain.’
In Part 2 of 2 I speculate that I may have discovered further evidence of destroyed ancient megalithic ruins, structure foundations, wreckage of some type of craft and many more artefacts.
Many of the megaliths have small features or knobs and holes. There are what appear to be remains of straight walls.
There is also what looks like a massive ‘fish’-shaped artefact, could this possibly be a fossil or sculpture?
One of my friends, Carlos Afonso, over on Facebook pointed out this HiRISE photograph to me.
NOTE: The original HiRISE provided by NASA is incredibly noisy.
This HiRISE photograph does not yet appear on Google Earth Mars.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_038846_1345) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 09 November 2014 and is described as ‘Terrain.’
In Part 1 of 2 I speculate that I may have discovered further evidence of destroyed ancient megalithic ruins, structure foundations, wreckage of some type of craft and a huge artefact that look like the shape of a fish.
Many of the megaliths have small features or knobs and holes. There are what appear to be remains of straight walls intersecting others at right angles.
There is also what looks like a massive triangular craft, perfectly symmetrical in shape and geometry.
One of my friends, Carlos Afonso, over on Facebook pointed out this HiRISE photograph to me.
NOTE: The original HiRISE provided by NASA is incredibly noisy.
This HiRISE photograph does not yet appear on Google Earth Mars.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (PSP_007525_1565) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 04 March 2008 and is described as ‘Wrinkle Ridge Cut by Theater-Headed Channels in Memnonia Fossae.’
Here I speculate I found artefacts which include everything from strange megalithic blocks to what looks like wreckage.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
I have been researching anomalies on Mars for several months now and have discovered vast terrains on Mars littered with what look like ancient megalithic blocks with small features or knobs and holes as well and ruins. Due to the vast number I found I thought it prudent to present my findings and compelling evidence in Part 4 of this Special Edition Series here and on YouTube.
In Part 4 I focus on Planet Mars as seen with Google Earth/Mars, showing each site and its respective anomalies linked by the white line as featured in Parts 1, 2 and 3.
This is a real-time Google Earth/Mars presentation, thus no images are available in the Post.
Please refer to the Post for Parts 1, 2 and 3 for respective information, images and links.
My YouTube video featuring ‘SPECIAL EDITION The Ancient Megaliths and Ruins of Mars – The Evidence (Part 4):’
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
I have been researching anomalies on Mars for several months now and have discovered vast terrains on Mars littered with what look like ancient megalithic blocks with small features or knobs and holes as well and ruins. Due to the vast number I found I thought it prudent to present my findings and compelling evidence in Part 3 of this Special Edition Series here and on YouTube.
Close examination of the megalithic blocks on Mars show that some have small features or knobs and others similar sized holes, not unlike those found on Earth.
Researchers studying ancient ruins on Earth are perplexed about the presence of the knobs found on most megaliths making up these ancient structures.
What researchers say about the megaliths with knobs found on Earth:
Some speculate that these knobs indicate some type of concrete moulding process was used, the knob being the point at which concrete was poured into a mould;
Others speculate that these are points where the rock was melted or softened using some type of technology to assist in softening the stone in the building process;
Others that these are the points at which the megaliths were broken off from the larger stone out of which they were formed; while
Others speculate these knobs may be handles of some sort to which ropes where attached to assist in pulling the blocks into place; while
While others speculate these were used to align joins.
The Megaliths on Mars, many of which have virtually the same proportions and size as their counterparts of Earth, have small features or knobs and holes mostly located in their centers. Some megaliths of Mars show the same signs of warping (concave surfaces) as those on Earth.
Whatever the reason for the small features or knobs and holes, finding a vast number of these strange megalithic blocks on Mars is highly unusual. Normal boulders and rocks do not have small, uniformly spaced, centered, mostly same sized features or knobs and holes on them which is why I speculate that these have been manufactured, perhaps by our ancient ancestors.
Other megaliths without knobs found on Earth:
Some megalithic blocks on Mars and Earth do not have these knobs. This type of megalith on Mars is just as huge and sometimes larger than similar megaliths found on Earth:
So why do the megaliths on Mars have small features or knobs and holes?
Here are a few theories some of my channel viewers and I are putting forward:
Perhaps they are artefacts caused by the manufacturing process, e.g. moulding;
Perhaps the knobs are points to which hoisting equipment is attached to aid in the construction of strucutres;
Could the megaliths with knobs fit into those with holes, i.e. like Lego pieces?
Maybe they are symbolic in nature, perhaps they have cultural/spiritual significance;
Perhaps they are symbols of defiance placed their by survivors of a catastrophic global war;
Might it be that the survivors are displaying these objects in patterns to get attention;
Possible fossilized remains of some type of life-forms that need ‘personal/growing space,’ hence the regular spacing between objects;
Perhaps these objects link sites together using some type of technology we have not yet discovered;
Could it be that the dark spot found in the centers of some objects are cones facing inward in what may be some type of water condensation processing plants?
Or are these objects used to generate electricity through some type of technology.
Geometry and dimensions of the megaliths on Mars:
Like those found on Earth, the general geometry of these megaliths on Mars range between chevron-shaped, plectrum-shaped, circular, semi-circular, rhombic, hexagonal, square and rectangular and range in size.
In general most measure a minimum of about 8 metres wide and a minimum of about 8 metres long. As the photographs taken by the orbiters is top-down it is difficult to estimate the depth, unless a megalith is lying on one of its sides. Some megaliths on Mars are much bigger than those found on Earth.
Furthermore the megaliths have mostly flat, smooth surfaces, well defined straight edges and 90 degree/right-angle corners.
Small features, knobs or holes are mostly located in the center of the megaliths, which is highly unnatural.
I speculate this geometry indicates intelligent design, furthermore that the same technique used to design and manufacture these megaliths on Earth was also used on Mars.
Where are these strange ancient megaliths and ruins located on Mars?
The vast majority of sites at which I discovered these peculiar megaliths with holes/knobs are in two latitude bands, one band in the Northern hemisphere and the other band in the Southern hemisphere, however a few other sites also featured here fall outside these bands.
The Northern hemisphere band ranges between latitudes 28 degrees North and 49 degrees North – in this band I discovered 6 sites with these peculiar megaliths – the distance between the 1st site and the last site is about 5300 km with varying distances between the remaining sites.
The Southern hemisphere band ranges between latitudes 51 degrees South and 36 degrees South – in this band I discovered 11 sites right around the planet, with these peculiar megaliths – the distance between these sites vary, for example 2800 km, 330 km, 1800 km 630 km and so on.
Examples of ancient megaliths and ruins on Mars:
Following are cases/sites of interest and a few prime examples from each case/site:
All of the sites examined here appear to have been devastated by some catastrophic event is the past. Many megaliths are scattered about and some show sign of erosion or damage. The structures or ruins are totally destroyed and in most cases only foundations are visible.
44) The Ancient Argyre Planitia Ruins of Mars
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_011925_1245) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 10 February 2009. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Layering in Argyre Planitia.’
Here I speculate I may have found ancient ruins showing toppled walls, foundations, terraces and more megalithic blocks with smaller knobs.
Some of the blocks appear to have been moulded or shaped to fit.
Don’t these ruins remind us of similar Inca/Mayan megalithic ruins found on Earth?
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_019077_2270) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 22 August 2010 describes the photograph as ‘Debris Apron in Phlegra Montes.’
More megalithic blocks, some with smaller dome-like features or knobs and perhaps wrecked machinery or technology.
Not shown in these images: Grid-like surface structures cover certain area’s of this area as well as what appear to be structures covered in sand. There are hints of underground entrances as well.
46) Megaliths and Wreckage West of Alexey Tolstoy on Mars
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_015967_1325) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 22 December 2009 describes the photograph as ‘Convergence of Lobate Crater Fill.’
Here I speculate that I discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs, what appears to be wreckage of some type of machinery or technology.
I further speculate that some of the anomalies look like hatches and others like they may have been arranged to be covers to underground entrance-ways.
In some cases I cannot say for certain whether the respective anomalies or artefacts are megalithic or wreckage.
Perhaps a surviving race of beings in using this debris/wreckage as structures or buildings/habitats.
Anyway, everything shown here seems to have been destroyed as is the case with all the other ruins I’ve covered in previous posts/video’s.
Could there be a spiritual significance to the pattern we see in the small features arranged in triangles/rows on top of the larger megalithic blocks/slabs?
47) The Epic Ruins and Wreckage of Charitum Montes on Mars (Part 1)
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_013244_1275) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 24 May 2009 describes the photograph as ‘Lobate Features in the Charitum Montes.’
Here I speculate that I discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs, what appears to be wreckage of some type of craft, machinery or technology.
I further speculate that some of the anomalies look like hatches and others like they may have been arranged to be covers to underground entrance-ways.
In some cases I cannot say for certain whether the respective anomalies or artefacts are megalithic or wreckage.
Perhaps a surviving race of beings in using this debris/wreckage as structures or buildings/habitats.
Anyway, everything shown here seems to have been destroyed as is the case with all the other ruins I’ve covered in previous posts/video’s.
Could there be a spiritual/cultural significance to the pattern we see displayed in the small features arranged in triangles/rows on top of the larger megalithic blocks/slabs?
48) The Epic Ruins and Wreckage of Charitum Montes on Mars (Part 2)
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_013244_1275) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 24 May 2009 describes the photograph as ‘Lobate Features in the Charitum Montes.’
In part 2 of 3 I speculate that I discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs, what appears to be wreckage of some type of craft, machinery or technology.
I further speculate that some of the anomalies look like hatches and others like they may have been arranged to be covers to underground entrance-ways.
In some cases I cannot say for certain whether the respective anomalies or artefacts are megalithic or wreckage.
Perhaps a surviving race of beings in using this debris/wreckage as structures or buildings/habitats.
Anyway, everything shown here seems to have been destroyed as is the case with all the other ruins I’ve covered in previous posts/video’s.
Could there be a spiritual/cultural significance to the pattern we see displayed in the small features arranged in triangles/rows on top of the larger megalithic blocks/slabs?
49) The Epic Ruins and Wreckage of Charitum Montes on Mars (Part 3)
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_013244_1275) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 24 May 2009 describes the photograph as ‘Lobate Features in the Charitum Montes.’
In part 3 of 3 I speculate that I discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs, what appears to be wreckage of some type of craft, machinery or technology.
I further speculate that some of the anomalies look like hatches and others like they may have been arranged to be covers to underground entrance-ways.
In some cases I cannot say for certain whether the respective anomalies or artefacts are megalithic or wreckage.
Perhaps a surviving race of beings in using this debris/wreckage as structures or buildings/habitats.
Anyway, everything shown here seems to have been destroyed as is the case with all the other ruins I’ve covered in previous posts/video’s.
Could there be a spiritual/cultural significance to the pattern we see displayed in the small features arranged in triangles/rows on top of the larger megalithic blocks/slabs?
50) The Megalithic Ruins of Oceanidum Mons on Mars
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_014272_1245) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 12 August 2009 describes the photograph as ‘Sinuous Ridge in Argyre Planitia.’
NASA speculates that these formations/anomalies were probably formed naturally. As NASA is unsure I will present evidence that these formations/anomalies are more likely artificial in nature, showing that intelligent design and construction methods were used.
Hence, I speculate that I discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs and what appears to be wreckage of some type machinery or technology.
I further speculate that some of the anomalies look like hatches and others like they may have been arranged to be covers to underground entrance-ways.
In some cases I cannot say for certain whether the respective anomalies or artefacts are megalithic or wreckage.
Anyway, everything shown here seems to have been destroyed as is the case with all the other ruins I’ve covered in previous posts/video’s.
51) Weird Structure found on Plains of Deuteronilus Mensae on Mars
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_028537_2270) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 28 August 2012 describes the photograph as ‘Grooved Plateau Surface in Deuteronilus Mensae.’
I speculate that I discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs and what appears to be a structure (shaped similar to a mantle piece clock), wreckage of some type machinery or technology and mining operations.
In some cases I cannot say for certain whether the respective anomalies or artefacts are megalithic or wreckage.
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_013805_1295) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 07 July 2009 describes the photograph as ‘Surface Rocks and Blocks.’
Here I speculate that I discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs and what appears to be wreckage of some type of machinery or technology.
In some cases I cannot say for certain whether the respective anomalies or artefacts are megalithic or wreckage.
Note: Although this HiRISE photograph is very high-resolution, the brightness and lack of contrast made it rather difficult to bring out details in the images that follow.
53) Strange Desolate Ruins in Western Argyre on Mars
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_012967_1290) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 02 May 2009 describes the photograph as ‘New Impact Site in Western Argyre Planitia.’
I speculate that I may have discovered further evidence of megalithic blocks with knobs and what appears to be ruined structures, e.g. foundations of buildings and walls.
In some cases the anomalies look like metallic wreckage.
One anomaly I show here looks like a round, convex shaped object, similar to a classic UFO/saucer dome-shaped craft partially buried in sand.
Note: This HiRISE photograph is very ‘noisy’ and contains artfacts that I tried to clean-up as best I could.
This photograph (ESP_025752_1395) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 24 January 2012.
NASA describes this photograph as “Reull Vallis.”
I discovered a bright blue light/object in a crevasse on Mars. It appears saucer-shaped and self-illuminating. None of the surrounding boulders have the same shape or colour.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
I have been researching anomalies on Mars for several months now and have discovered vast terrains on Mars littered with what look like ancient megalithic blocks with small features or knobs and holes as well and ruins. Due to the vast number I found I thought it prudent to present my findings and compelling evidence in Part 2 of this Special Edition Series here and on YouTube.
Close examination of the megalithic blocks on Mars show that some have small features or knobs and others similar sized holes, not unlike those found on Earth.
Researchers studying ancient ruins on Earth are perplexed about the presence of the knobs found on most megaliths making up these ancient structures.
What researchers say about the megaliths with knobs found on Earth:
Some speculate that these knobs indicate some type of concrete moulding process was used, the knob being the point at which concrete was poured into a mould;
Others speculate that these are points where the rock was melted or softened using some type of technology to assist in softening the stone in the building process;
Others that these are the points at which the megaliths were broken off from the larger stone out of which they were formed; while
Others speculate these knobs may be handles of some sort to which ropes where attached to assist in pulling the blocks into place; while
While others speculate these were used to align joins.
The Megaliths on Mars, many of which have virtually the same proportions and size as their counterparts of Earth, have small features or knobs and holes mostly located in their centers. Some megaliths of Mars show the same signs of warping (concave surfaces) as those on Earth.
Whatever the reason for the small features or knobs and holes, finding a vast number of these strange megalithic blocks on Mars is highly unusual. Normal boulders and rocks do not have small, uniformly spaced, centered, mostly same sized features or knobs and holes on them which is why I speculate that these have been manufactured, perhaps by our ancient ancestors.
Other megaliths without knobs found on Earth:
Some megalithic blocks on Mars and Earth do not have these knobs. This type of megalith on Mars is just as huge and sometimes larger than similar megaliths found on Earth:
So why do the megaliths on Mars have small features or knobs and holes?
Here are a few theories some of my channel viewers and I are putting forward:
Perhaps they are artefacts caused by the manufacturing process, e.g. moulding;
Perhaps the knobs are points to which hoisting equipment is attached to aid in the construction of strucutres;
Could the megaliths with knobs fit into those with holes, i.e. like Lego pieces?
Maybe they are symbolic in nature, perhaps they have cultural/spiritual significance;
Perhaps they are symbols of defiance placed their by survivors of a catastrophic global war;
Might it be that the survivors are displaying these objects in patterns to get attention;
Possible fossilized remains of some type of life-forms that need ‘personal/growing space,’ hence the regular spacing between objects;
Perhaps these objects link sites together using some type of technology we have not yet discovered;
Could it be that the dark spot found in the centers of some objects are cones facing inward in what may be some type of water condensation processing plants?
Or are these objects used to generate electricity through some type of technology.
Geometry and dimensions of the megaliths on Mars:
Like those found on Earth, the general geometry of these megaliths on Mars range between chevron-shaped, plectrum-shaped, circular, semi-circular, rhombic, hexagonal, square and rectangular and range in size.
In general most measure a minimum of about 8 metres wide and a minimum of about 8 metres long. As the photographs taken by the orbiters is top-down it is difficult to estimate the depth, unless a megalith is lying on one of its sides. Some megaliths on Mars are much bigger than those found on Earth.
Furthermore the megaliths have mostly flat, smooth surfaces, well defined straight edges and 90 degree/right-angle corners.
Small features, knobs or holes are mostly located in the center of the megaliths, which is highly unnatural.
I speculate this geometry indicates intelligent design, furthermore that the same technique used to design and manufacture these megaliths on Earth was also used on Mars.
Where are these strange ancient megaliths and ruins located on Mars?
The vast majority of sites at which I discovered these peculiar megaliths with holes/knobs are in two latitude bands, one band in the Northern hemisphere and the other band in the Southern hemisphere, however a few other sites also featured here fall outside these bands.
The Northern hemisphere band ranges between latitudes 28 degrees North and 49 degrees North – in this band I discovered 6 sites with these peculiar megaliths – the distance between the 1st site and the last site is about 5300 km with varying distances between the remaining sites.
The Southern hemisphere band ranges between latitudes 51 degrees South and 36 degrees South – in this band I discovered 11 sites right around the planet, with these peculiar megaliths – the distance between these sites vary, for example 2800 km, 330 km, 1800 km 630 km and so on.
Examples of ancient megaliths and ruins on Mars:
Following are cases/sites of interest and a few prime examples from each case/site:
All of the sites examined here appear to have been devastated by some catastrophic event is the past. Many megaliths are scattered about and some show sign of erosion or damage. The structures or ruins are totally destroyed and in most cases only foundations are visible.
22) Giant Megaliths in Kotka Crater on the Mars Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line
A Saturn Ark and RaptorZone Collaboration
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which further evidence supporting the speculation of a Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line which connects ancient ruins is presented.
This photograph (PSP_007447_1995) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 27 February 2008.
NASA describes this photograph as “Well-Preserved 40-Kilometer Diameter Unnamed Crater Near Tartarus Region.”
Discovered is what looks like huge ancient, eroded and damaged Monolithic/Megalithic blocks in Kotka Crater and an extensive debris field and perhaps mining operation.
The Monolithic/Megalithic blocks in Kotka Crater look similar to the one in Asimov Crater, i.e. the textures and shade of colour appear similar. It is rather difficult to obtain any measurements from these blocks as they are partially buried in sand. The one side that is visible measures between approximately 23 and 30 metres across (the angle makes it difficult to be certain and a piece may have broken off).
24) Walled Structures and Megaliths found in Asimov Crater
This photograph (PSP_003880_1325) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 25 May 2007.
NASA describes this photograph as “33 Gullies Previously Identified and Fully Described in MOC Image M18-01931.”
Discovered are what look like walls or structures in Asimov Crater. The sides of the building blocks appear to be covered in smooth, white, reflective material like plaster or cement.
There are several huge megalithic blocks scattered about in the gullies.
25) Huge Debris Field found near the Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line on Mars
A Saturn Ark and RaptorZone Collaboration
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which more anomalies and artefacts are presented.
This photograph (ESP_032158_1185) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 06 June 2013.
NASA describes this photograph as “USGS Dune Database 1699-613 Changes.”
Discovered are what looks like a huge debris field of machine, vehicle, craft and structure pieces and parts (average size of these anomalies is between 3 m and 10 m across).
26) Giant Buried Structures found in Renaudot Crater on Mars
his photograph (ESP_035036_2225) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 16 January 2014.
NASA describes this photograph as “Central Peak Ring of Renaudot Crater.”
I discovered what looks like giant structures on Mars, in particular there is a large triangular structure measuring approximately 300 metres per side.
There are various other structures, including several small ‘Stonehenge-type’ structures each measuring approximately 40 metres in diameter.
Many small objects are scattered throughout this photograph. The objects, which may be artificial debris from some kind of technology, measure between 5 metres and 10 metres across.
27) Asimov Crater-Type Anomalies Discovered in Gorgonum Chaos on Mars
A Saturn Ark and RaptorZone Collaboration
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which more anomalies and artefacts are presented.
This photograph (PSP_008198_1425) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 26 April 2008.
NASA describes this photograph as “Gullies in Gorgonum Chaos Mesas”
Discovered are what look like similar walls/structures built using large blocks as those found in Asimov Crater as well as multiple craft/machine/tech looking anomalies.
28) Matching Pair of Derelict Classic UFO-Type ‘Craft’ or Objects Found on Mars
A Saturn Ark and RaptorZone Collaboration
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which more anomalies and artefacts are presented.
On the 13th of March 2018 I discovered what looks like a small, derelict classic UFO-type ‘craft’ on Mars in a HiRISE photograph (ESP_014166_1820) taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 04 August 2009 and NASA describes this photograph as “Possible Layering in Block Material in Hydraotes Chaos.” It has a larger flat disc and a smaller oval dome on top and measures approximately 8 metres in diameter.
New discovery, matching ‘craft:’
On the 17th of May 2018 my friend, Saturn Ark, discovered a matching derelict ‘craft’ with the same dimensions and shape in another HiRISE photograph 6463 km away. This craft in this photograph appears to be a lot more damaged, almost wrecked, compared to the one I found. The photograph (PSP_007740_2250) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 21 March 2008 and NASA describes this photograph as “Crater in Scalloped and Pitted Terrain in Utopia Planitia.”
29) The Star Trek 2001 Mars Rendezvous – An Ode to Roddenberry and Clarke
he photograph analyzed here (B17_016259_2199_XN_39N300W) were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Context Camera (CTX) Camera on 2010-01-14. NASA describes the photographs as “Protonilus/Nilosyrtis fretted terrain – northern plains transition area.’
This is a tribute to two brilliant men, Eugene Roddenberry, creator of the Star Trek television series and Sir Arthur C. Clarke, author or 2001: A Space Odyssey.
I discovered what looks like the Star Trek Enterprise primary (saucer section) and secondary hulls without warp nacelles parked on the Martian surface and a huge monolith as featured in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
The ‘Enterprise’ measures approximately 300 metres across and the ‘monolith’ approximately 2 km long by 300 metres wide.
I just thought this is a great NASA photograph that unwittingly pays homage to two great guys and the awesome legacy they left for us and future generations.
These anomalies featured in my Viewers Special YouTube video in which I gave my viewers an opportunity to let me know what their take on these anomalies are, however only one viewer responded.
30) Were Megalithic Blocks with Knobs Manufactured on Mars?
The photograph analyzed here (PSP_006516_1385) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE Camera on 17 December 2007. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Hellespontus-Noachis Region Intracrater Deposit.’
I discovered a vast terrain on Mars littered with what look like megalithic blocks with knobs. Due to the vast number I speculate that this area may have been a large-scale megalithic block manufacturing site otherwise these are remnants of destroyed ancient buildings/structures.
Close examination of the megalithic blocks on Mars show that most have small knobs, not unlike those found on Earth. Researchers studying ancient ruins on Earth are perplexed about the presence of the knobs found on most megaliths making up these ancient structures.
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_019451_2235) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE Camera on 20 September 2010. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Eroded Crater Ejecta and Mantled Terrain in Deuteronilus Mensae.’
I discovered another vast terrain on Mars littered with what look like megalithic blocks with knobs. Due to the vast number I speculate that ancient buildings/structures were built here and that some devastating event destroyed them in the distant past.
Megalithic ruins such as these and those featured in my previous Blog Post’s and YouTube video’s seem to indicate this was the preferred building style of the ancient civilization/s that once thrived on Mars.
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_023234_2095) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE Camera on 11 July 2011. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Olivine-Rich Terrain in Nilosyrtis Region.’
I discovered what looks like another partially buried, large megalithic-block on Mars (approximately 8 metres wide). I further speculate that this block was part of a retaining wall similar to those found in Asimov Crater.
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_028379_1405) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE Camera on 15 August 2012. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Fresh Small Crater on Rocky Filled Floor of a Much Larger Crater.’
I discovered what looks like another large debris field on Mars. Seen are more megalithic blocks with knobs, disc-shaped objects with small domes on top and wreckage of machinery or technology.
The photographs analyzed here (B05_011413_1790_XN_01S113W and PSP_002671_1790) were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 01 January 2009 and 20 February 2007 respectively. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Ride-along with HiRISE’ and ‘Possible Cinder Cone on the Southern Flank of Pavonis Mons’ respectively.
I discovered what looks like an ancient ruin on Mars consisting of two opposing chevron-type structures/walls. The side of each wall measures approximately 480 metres in length with a gap of 180 metres and 350 metres respectively between the two structures/walls.
Could these two chevron shapes be the remnants of a square structure/walled-in area that collapsed in the distant past?
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_023929_1425) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 04 September 2011. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Remnant of Unconformable Deposit in Electris.’
I discovered what appears to be further ancient megalithic ruins consisting of massive, broken megalithic blocks.
Some structures are still relatively intact and show a few blocks that have become dislodged.
Again, there are multiple anomalies that look like wrecked craft, damaged machinery or tech, underground entrance-ways and pieces of sculptures, even what look like a giant hatch.
Are these ancient ruins built by a civilization that lived on Mars in the distant past or were these structures formed through a natural geological processes?
To quote NASA: ‘One goal of this observation is to try to determine the origin of what’s called the ‘mantling deposit.’ How was this deposit placed here?’
Due to the fact that I have discovered multiple sites on Mars with similar matching megalithic blocks and similar objects I speculate these ancient ruins are artificial in nature.
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_012445_1880) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 23 March 2009. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Disrupted and Blocky Outcrop in Cerberus Palus.’
I discovered what appears to be further ancient megalithic ruins consisting of massive, broken megalithic blocks.
Furthermore it looks like the area consisted of artificially made islands inside a canal-type system.
There are also other weird anomalies including what looks like an eroded pyramid with only one side still relatively intact. There is also a square block consisting of nine small square blocks.
PS: I decided not to include close-up zooms of the anomalies because the HiRISE photograph is too ‘noisy,’ salt and pepper and thin interference lines.
The photograph analyzed here (PSP_005860_1340) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 27 October 2007. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Erosional Features and Knob in Argyre Planitia.’
I discovered what appears to be further evidence of ancient broken megalithic blocks with knobs or smaller features on top and what may be wreckage.
There may even be a few underground entrance-ways shown, only speculating.
38) Ancient Ruins and Tech South East of Douglass Crater on Mars
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_013864_1220) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 11 July 2009. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Sharp Boundary on Crater Floor.’
I discovered another vast terrain on the Martian surface littered with megalithic blocks with knobs or smaller features on top, wrecked craft or machinery/technology.
It looks like I discovered matching objects again.
There may even be a few underground entrance-ways and/or underground habitat ventilation caps shown, only speculating.
I further speculate that the blocks have been arrange somehow and the smaller features have been physically placed on top of them in patterns. Perhaps these are shrines with a special meaning to them. Might this even be a burial ground?
The photograph analyzed here (PSP_005330_1275) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 15 September 2007. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Hellespontus Region Dune Field.’
Discovered here is what I speculate to be further evidence of ancient ruins and technology on Mars.
I also found what looks like a wrecked Quimbaya ‘Jet’-type object approximately 20 metres long. I wonder what Giorgio from Ancient Aliens will think of this artefact?
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_027043_2290) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 03 May 2012. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Thermophysical Contacts.’
Located just to the west of the Viking 2 Lander site, this area is littered with what look like ancient megalithic ruins.
Found are more megalithic blocks with smaller features or knobs on top. Some blocks are arranged in geometric patterns/walls, however the event/s that devastated the planet in the distant past totally destroyed what may have been structures.
41) Hellas Region Crater Floor Debris Field on Mars
he photograph analyzed here (ESP_022797_1370) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 07 June 2011. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Greater Hellas Region Crater Floor.’
This ancient debris field consisting of more megalithic blocks with knobs and other destroyed, tech-like objects is located closer to the equator and is in an entirely new location on Mars.
I speculate that large parts of the surface of Mars was populated by some civilization/s in the distant past and that a catastrophic event destroyed their structures/buildings.
Some may have survived, hence the placement/arrangement of the blocks and smaller features which may have been done after the fact.
I have also discovered what appear to be active mining operations shown in some of my previous videos, please check them out when you get the chance.
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_036655_1735) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 22 May 2014. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Layered Material in Aeolis Region.’
I speculate I may have found more heavily eroded megalithic blocks, a type of stepped structure and another rectangular opening/mine/entrance-way cut into the side of a hill.
Might this evidence point to some type of megalithic block mining/extraction activity?
This is a collaborative work between my friend, Saturn Ark and myself in which evidence supporting a possible ancient link between Kunowsky on Mars and the Giza Pyramid Complex on Earth is presented.
Following eight years of research, my friend discovered why the Artwork is upside down. The Artwork needed to be rotated approximately 98 degrees to show that geometry lines extended out of Kunowsky on Mars correspond or map to the Giza Pyramid Complex in Cairo as well as aligns with the Red Sea on Earth.
The Kunowsky geometry lines extend out of three points on Mars:
Firstly the semi-buried, mostly eroded pyramid which links up with the Giza Pyramid Complex on Earth;
Secondly the Red Sea next to the African Continent in the Martian surface Artwork which links up with the Red Sea on Earth, and;
Thirdly the ‘Jackal’ links up with the center of the Asimov Ruins. A giant Monolith lying against a cliff face is located approximately 30 km’s to the south-east of these ruins.
The Kunowsky Pyramid and Martian surface Artwork are visible in two HiRISE photographs (PSP_006860_2370 and ESP_016314_2370) which were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 13 January 2008 and 18 January 2010 respectively. NASA describes the photographs as “Possible Olivine in Crater” and “Kunowsky Crater Central Peak” respectively.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
This is a collaborative work between my friend, Saturn Ark and myself in which evidence supporting a possible ancient link between Kunowsky on Mars and the Giza Pyramid Complex on Earth is presented.
Following eight years of research, my friend discovered why the Artwork is upside down. The Artwork needed to be rotated approximately 98 degrees to show that geometry lines extended out of Kunowsky on Mars correspond or map to the Giza Pyramid Complex in Cairo as well as aligns with the Red Sea on Earth.
The Kunowsky geometry lines extend out of three points on Mars:
Firstly the semi-buried, mostly eroded pyramid which links up with the Giza Pyramid Complex on Earth;
Secondly the Red Sea next to the African Continent in the Martian surface Artwork which links up with the Red Sea on Earth, and;
Thirdly the ‘Jackal’ links up with the center of the Asimov Ruins. A giant Monolith lying against a cliff face is located approximately 30 km’s to the south-east of these ruins.
The Kunowsky Pyramid and Martian surface Artwork are visible in two HiRISE photographs (PSP_006860_2370 and ESP_016314_2370) which were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 13 January 2008 and 18 January 2010 respectively. NASA describes the photographs as “Possible Olivine in Crater” and “Kunowsky Crater Central Peak” respectively.
The Kunowsky Pyramid and Arch:
The HiRISE photograph (ESP_016314_2370) shows what looks like a toppled arch-type structure on top of the pyramid and layers consisting of rectangular slabs/tiles covering the main pyramidal structure.
Shown here are some of the other anomalies found on or in the vicinity of the Pyramid:
The Kunowsky Martian surface Artwork:
The HiRISE photograph (PSP_006860_2370) shows what looks like Martian surface Artwork – raw and rotated to fit the screen:
The Kunowsky Martian surface Artwork appears to depict the following (the image overlays are intended for the purpose of assisting with the identification of the items contained within the Artwork):
The name Cairo, according to ‘African Heritage,’ means ‘Place or Camp of Mars.’
When toggling between Google Earth Mars and Google Earth you will notice that the geometry lines line up perfectly.
Geometry Lines from Google Earth Mars:
Giza Pyramid Complex – Opposite intersection point:
The point on the opposite side of Mars at which the Giza Pyramid Complex geometry lines intersect (ESP_016623_1495), which NASA calls ‘Intersecting Graben,’ shows a strange area in which there is what appears to be a triangular-shaped ‘craft,’ some wreckage and megalithic blocks.
I find it rather interesting that NASA calls this photograph ‘Intersecting Graben,’ i.e. the intersection point of the Giza Pyramid Complex geometric lines also intersect at this particular location, co-incidence?
The Giant Asimov Monolith and Ruins:
The geometry line extending out towards Asimov links up with the center of the Asimov Ruins (PSP_003880_1325), shown here are a few of the megalithic blocks found in the area:
A giant Monolith lying against a cliff face is located approximately 30 km’s to the south-east of these ruins (ESP_012411_1320). The Monolith dimensions are in the ratio of 1 : 4 : 9 (the squares of the first three positive integers, i.e. 1² : 2² : 3²) and measures approximately 33 metres by 75 metres, which yields an aspect ratio of 2.27 whereas the aspect ratio of Clarke’s Monoliths are 2.25 (9 divided by 4). The exact measurements are difficult to obtain as the Monolith is damaged and somewhat buried.
Shown here are some of the megalithic blocks with knobs found near the Giant Monolith:
Disclaimer:
The geometry lines were mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometers. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
Although the so-called face and pyramids in Cydonia were discovered years ago they still feature in presentations and documentaries today. I’m sure you agree that it’s time for something new and refreshing.
Featured here are another face and pyramids I discovered just North of Gale crater where NASA is operating it’s Curiosity rover. Also featured are anomalies in three other area’s of interest.
The massive anomalies shown here include everything from a ‘face’ to pyramids, an ‘eye’ and other strange geometric structures. There are also multiple matching structures.
The following photographs taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter CTX Camera are analysed here:
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”