This anomaly was originally discovered by Richard Hoagland; he speculated that this may be a “spaceship.”
It’s rather difficult to tell whether this anomaly is concave or convex in shape.
Case #6: Derelict crashed craft on Mars?:
NASA released this image (AB-1-085/05 or ab108505) on its website on 22 December 2000.
Should this be an oval shape craft and not a crater on the edge of a cliff it can be speculated that it could possibly be a derelict crashed craft, abandoned by the ancients a long time ago.
The craft does seem to extend past the cliff edge and the shadow cast on the craft does appear to be on the same side to that of the shadows cast by the cliff ridges, making the case for this being a crater highly unlikely.
The original NASA image is of a very low quality, i.e. the brightness is way up and the contrast way down. There are also many vertical lines through the image which make it even harder to get a clear view of the object in question.
This is a curious case in that it is difficult to determine exactly what NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE camera imaged.
There is speculation that it is an entrance to an underground base or a craft of some kind. Who knows?
Case #5: Dome and cube found on Mars:
The sunlight is seen reflecting off the side of the metallic looking dome and cube. This might even be a base. The round part is approximately 65 metres across and the walls are 7 to 10 metres thick. The object appears to be artificial as it has geometry and symmetry.
The only way to see the object clearly is by using the NASA image viewer located to the left of the web page. Click the “Toggle full page” icon followed by the “Zoom in” icon. Click on “Zoom in” until the maximum image size is displayed. The object is located in the middle right of the image.
I followed the process described above, combining several screenshots into a large, complete image which you can download here (file size: 2.78 Mbytes).
I tried downloading the original PNG, GIF, JPEG, TIFF and PDF files; however the resolution of each is too low to see the object clearly. Perhaps try downloading the JP2 file?
On 29 December 2006 NASA released this image (PSP_001984_1735) taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE camera.
“Mars archaeologists” claim they have discovered a UFO flying saucer that crashed on the Martian surface.
Case #4: Crashed disc found on Mars?:
The crash site, in the Candor Chasma region of Mars, has the coordinates: 6°25’40.89 S 76°53’48.65 W (Google Earth).
Shown in the image is a half-buried disc-like object approximately 13 metres diameter. A long trench can be seen behind the object inferring it may be a craft that crash landed on the Martian surface, hitting the surface at high speed and low trajectory angle.
The object can be seen in both images on Google Earth (Mars) and on the NASA HiRISE website respectively (the possible crash site is located to the top right in the NASA image).
On 10 February 2008 NASA released this image (PSP_007230_2170) taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE camera.
Looking at the complete image you will note not just the massive dome but also many, destroyed and half buried “glass tubes” in the Martian soil (click on the image below for a larger view).
Case #3: Massive dome in crater on Mars:
Many may argue that this is not a dome but rather the bottom of the crater that was filled with water and later dried up and left a wavy pattern in the Martian soil.
This may seem plausible, however NASA’s description of the image states: “Crater with Textured Mound in Central Acidalia Planitia” inferring it is actually a spherical, dome-like object casting a shadow on the crater wall.
A similar dome was built at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, but was dismantled in January 2010.
NASA in the meantime seems to have removed/replaced this particular image on its website as well.
Anyway, looking at the original crash site we see that the craft, i.e. UFO which is approximately 190 metres (600 feet) wide impacted the surface at a low angle ending up half buried in the Martian soil.
The image, M11-01534 (MOC Image M1101534) currently on NASA’s website on the other hand does not resemble the original image at all. What is seen is a very blurred object emitting what appears to be a beam of very bright light onto the Martian surface.
Was the original image replaced or modified by a NASA image specialist? Here is an example of yet another obvious cover-up.
I think this is a crashed TR-3B which NASA imaged and released to the public, now they are covering it up. The reason I think so is that the TR-3B operational model also measures 190 metres (600 feet) wide and whistle blowers have indicated that the TR-3B has been to Mars.
Does anyone know what happened to the original NASA image, M11-01534 (MOC Image M1101534)? Please let me know and I’ll update this article with the details.
Several Mars obiter images released by NASA over the years show large disc-like objects and domes on the planet’s surface.
Who knows whether or not these objects are naturally occurring? If they are artificial in nature they can only be classified as unidentified objects … perhaps UFO’s or bases?
Here I’ll share some of the more compelling cases.
Case #1: Disc-like craft with two large, black rectangular windows:
This image from NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) shows a disc-like craft with two large, black rectangular windows on the surface of Mars just above a steep cliff. The sunlight is seen reflecting off the side of the metallic craft. This might even be a base. The object appears to be artificial as it has geometry and symmetry.
NASA indicates in the description that Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) obtained grey-scale high resolution images typically 1.5 to 12 m per pixel. I estimate this to be a rather large craft at approximately 50 metres in diameter.
The only way to see the object clearly is by using the NASA image viewer located to the left of the web page. Click the “Toggle full page” icon followed by the “Zoom in” icon. Click on “Zoom in” until the maximum image size is displayed. The object is located in the bottom quarter of the image. Perhaps the “PDS Source Data” has a higher resolution image.
I followed the process described above, combining several screenshots into a large, complete image which you can download here (file size: 4.62 Mbytes).
I tried downloading the original PNG, GIF, JPEG, TIFF and PDF files; however the resolution of each is too low to see the object clearly.
A while ago Spirit rover captured a sequence of images some Sol’s apart. In it there seems to be an object in the back ground that has moved. Neville Thompson claims he has debunked the mystery; referring to some sort of error-of-parallax. I don’t fully agree with this analysis and tend towards Will’s initial analysis.
I have placed a yellow marker above the “moving” object. The images below show how the perspective between the images changes. The object in my opinion has moved further than in would have if it were static.
The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) is a NASA imaging project and focuses on data returned from Mars Global Surveyor, Mars Odyssey, and regional surveys conducted by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.
The controversial HiRISE image below seems to indicate the presence of trees growing in rows and formations of crystal like shards on the Martian surface.
I’ve highlighted some of these trees and crystal like structures. The layer of white carbon dioxide ice passes behind these objects. There is also a red dust cloud behind the group of the trees. Check out the surface from where the trees are growing. The evidence shows that the trees are rooted (thick root systems are clearly visible). One group of trees at the middle, top of the image are upside-down and there is a red dust cloud visible behind them, this too me indicates some image manipulation, i.e. all the remaining trees are pointing up towards the sky.
NASA’s explanation: “There is a vast region of sand dunes at high northern latitudes on Mars. In the winter, a layer of carbon dioxide ice covers the dunes, and in the spring as the sun warms the ice it evaporates. This is a very active process, and sand dislodged from the crests of the dunes cascades down, forming dark streaks.”
Several “dark streaks” start at the crest of some dunes, whereas other “dark streaks” are seen in absolutely flat areas between dunes, i.e. they can’t flow there.
In my opinion the trees and formation of crystal shards are pointing up towards the sky and are not flat on the surface; whether or not these are trees remains to be seen. NASA’s logic and explanation makes no sense. Unarguably this is a very intriguing image and will cause debate for years to come.