This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which more anomalies and artefacts are presented.
This photograph (ESP_032158_1185) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 06 June 2013.
NASA describes this photograph as “USGS Dune Database 1699-613 Changes.”
Discovered are what looks like a huge debris field of machine, vehicle, craft and structure pieces and parts (average size of these anomalies is between 3 m and 10 m across).
Pure speculation as always, these anomalies look like something unnatural and are not specifically something unnatural.
I downloaded the HiRise black and white map-projected image to view these anomalies.
This is a 100th Video Special Edition in which I revisit some of my previous video’s, taking a look at the weirdest, strangest and most important Martian anomalies I discovered.
Disclaimer:
Many or all of the anomalies covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
Special thank you to: NASA, JPL, University of Arizona and to my friend Saturn Ark for those parts of the video featuring our combined collaboration.
Subscribe to my YouTube channel and turn on notifications to be notified when new videos are uploaded.
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which more anomalies and artefacts are presented.
This photograph (PSP_009807_1995) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 29 August 2008.
NASA describes this photograph as “Western Portion of Well-Preserved Crater Near Tartarus Region.”
Discovered is what looks like huge ancient, eroded and damaged Monolithic/Megalithic blocks in Kotka Crater and an extensive debris field and perhaps mining operation.
Pure speculation as always, these anomalies look like something unnatural and are not specifically something unnatural.
I downloaded the HiRise B&W Map-Projected JP2 file’s to view these anomalies.
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which further evidence supporting the speculation of a Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line which connects ancient ruins is presented.
This photograph (PSP_007447_1995) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 27 February 2008.
NASA describes this photograph as “Well-Preserved 40-Kilometer Diameter Unnamed Crater Near Tartarus Region.”
Discovered is what looks like huge ancient, eroded and damaged Monolithic/Megalithic blocks in Kotka Crater and an extensive debris field and perhaps mining operation.
The Monolithic/Megalithic blocks in Kotka Crater look similar to the one in Asimov Crater, i.e. the textures and shade of colour appear similar. It is rather difficult to obtain any measurements from these blocks as they are partially buried in sand. The one side that is visible measures between approximately 23 and 30 metres across (the angle makes it difficult to be certain and a piece may have broken off).
Pure speculation as always, these anomalies look like something unnatural and are not specifically something unnatural.
Kotka Crater and the Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line:
Kotka Crater is on the Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line.
The Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line was originally discovered by Saturn Ark and many anomalies are being discovered along this line. Kotka Crater is no different.
Similarities between Kotka Crater and Asimov Crater:
There are a number of crater floor similarities between the two craters:
Huge Megalithic-type blocks
Vast area’s of dried mud
Signs of vast sunken area’s
Signs of liquid, possibly water flows
Other Anomalies and Artefacts found in Kotka Crater:
I downloaded the HiRise B&W Map-Projected JP2 file’s to view these anomalies.
Saturn Ark may have discovered what might be a witty Ode to both Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov in Asimov Crater.
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which evidence supporting this speculation is presented.
This photograph (ESP_012411_1320) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 20 March 2009.
NASA describes this photograph as “Cascading Channel in Noachis Pit Crater in MOC M12-00595.”
Discovered is what looks like a huge ancient, eroded and damaged Monolith-type object in Asimov Crater and an extensive debris field.
Could the naming of Asimov Crater be a witty Ode to both Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov?
It is well known that there was a witty rivalry between Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov, both undisputed masters of science fiction in the 20th century.
“Clarke chose to ratify the treaty in the dedication to his essay collection Report on Planet Three and Other Speculations, a wry encapsulation of his witty war with his fellow titan of the genre: In accordance with the terms of the Clarke-Asimov treaty, the second-best science writer dedicates this book to the second-best science-fiction writer.” Barnes & Noble
“Asimov Crater is an impact crater in the Noachis quadrangle of Mars, located at 47.0° S and 355.05° W. It is 84.0 km in diameter and was named after Isaac Asimov (1920–1992), an American biochemist and writer. The name was officially adopted on May 4, 2009.” Wikipedia
On 20 March 2009 NASA’s HiRISE photographed a Monolith-type object which Clarke wrote about in his 2001: A Space Odyssey and the craters name, Asimov Crater, was officially adopted on 04 May 2009, almost two months later.
All Clarke’s monoliths are rectangular with dimensions in the ratio of 1 : 4 : 9 (the squares of the first three positive integers, i.e. 1² : 2² : 3²). The Monolith-type object on Mars measure approximately 33 metres by 75 metres, which yields an aspect ratio of 2.27 whereas the aspect ration of Clarke’s Monoliths are 2.25 (9 divided by 4). The exact measurements are difficult to obtain as the Monolith is damaged and somewhat buried.
Could it be that NASA named this Asimov Crater to poke fun at Clarke and Asimov? The two authors would probably see the humor in it. Furthermore, could Clarke have had insider information about the Monolith-type object on Mars before we wrote 2001: A Space Odyssey?
Pure speculation as always, these anomalies look like something unnatural and are not specifically something unnatural.
Other Anomalies and Artefacts found in Asimov Crater:
Pieces of sculptures, statues or structures:
Objects with smaller features in their centers:
Crashed craft:
Destroyed technology:
I downloaded the HiRise B&W Map-Projected JP2 file’s to view these anomalies.
This photograph (ESP_017257_2360) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 02 April 2010.
NASA describes this photograph as “Megabreccia in the Central Uplift of Stokes Crater.”
Stokes Crater is on the Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line discovered by Saturn Ark as well as on the same latitude line, 56 degrees North.
Stokes Crater and Kunowsky Crater have uncanny similarities, i.e. artefacts, anomalies and geology, etc.
I discovered what look like multiple destroyed structures, statues, crashed craft, destroyed machinery and perhaps shelters or underground entrance-ways plus much more.
There are what appear to be rock type slabs, very similar to the ‘Kunowsky Arch.’
Perhaps even ‘Stonehenge’ type structures.
Thank you Saturn Ark for your Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line discovery.
Pure speculation as always, these anomalies look like something unnatural and are not specifically something unnatural.
Stokes Crater and the Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line:
Stokes Crater is on the Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line and is at the same Latitude as Kunowsky Crater, namely 56 degrees North.
The Kunowsky-Asimov Ley Line was originally discovered by Saturn Ark and many anomalies are being discovered along this line. Stokes Crater is no different.
Similarities between Stokes Crater and Kunowsky Crater:
There are a number of crater floor similarities between the two craters:
Vast area’s of dried mud
Massive dark dunes
Very bright bedrock often with geometric cracks
Stokes Crater Anomalies and Artefacts:
I downloaded the HiRise B&W Map-Projected JP2 file’s to view these anomalies.
This photograph (PSP_006224_1385) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE Camera on 24 November 2007.
NASA describes this photograph as “Sample of Harmakhis Vallis.”
I discovered what looks like a sculpture of an alien head, almost like the typical reptilian alien described by alien abductees. Also more small, possibly craft and destroyed machines and structures.
Pure speculation as always, these anomalies look like something unnatural and are not specifically something unnatural.