Bernard Crater Megaliths and Surface Anomalies on Mars

The photograph analyzed here (PSP_005956_1570) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 03 November 2007 and is described as ‘Bernard Crater.’

Bernard Crater is actually more of a circular depression, very similar to Asimov (anomalies in Asimov covered in previous video’s).

Anomalies found in Bernard appear to be megalithic in nature and there is what looks like another classic flying saucer type object partially covered in sand.

An elevated view of this site being analyzed
An elevated view of this site being analyzed (click for larger image)
An elevated view of this site being analyzed
An elevated view of this site being analyzed (click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)
(click for larger image)

Original NASA source:

https://www.uahirise.org/PSP_005956_1570

My YouTube video featuring ‘Bernard Crater Megaliths and Surface Anomalies on Mars:’

Subscribe to my YouTube channel and turn on Notifications to receive updates when I upload new video’s.

Links to all my other sites:

https://www.youtube.com/JeanWard (Mars anomalies)

https://mars.raptorzone.co.za (Mars anomalies)

http://www.raptorzone.co.za (my website)

http://wxsat.raptorzone.co.za (weather satellites)

https://twitter.com/raptorzn_ (@RaptorZN_)

https://www.facebook.com/JeanWardMarsAnomalies (Facebook)

http://blog.raptorzone.co.za (social and political issues)

Disclaimer:

Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.

Geometry lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.

Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.

In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.

My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.

As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”